1. Bruno MA. Extending the scope of quality and safety in radiology. Radiology. 2022; 302(3): 620-621. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021212538.
2. Chetlen AL, Petscavage-Thomas J, Cherian RA, Ulano A, Nandwana SB, Curci NE, et al. Collaborative Learning in Radiology: From Peer Review to Peer Learning and Peer Coaching. Academic Radiology. 2020; 27: 1261-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.021.
3. Kushnir KV. Quality of Management in the Modern Radiology Department. Medical Visualization. 2015; 3: 133-137. (In Russ.)
4. Meldo AA. Development and evaluation of quality management processes in the radyology department of government specialized clinic. Diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy. 2018; 1: 5-10. (In Russ.) doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2018-9-1-5-10.
5. Morozov SP, Vetsheva NN, Ledikhova NV. Quality assessment of radiology studies. Series “Best Practices in Radiation and Instrumental Diagnostics». Vol. 47. M., 2019. 47 p. (In Russ.)
6. Morozov S, Guseva E, Ledikhova N, Vladzymyrskyy A, Safronov D. Telemedicine-based system for quality management and peer review in radiology. Insights Imaging. 2018; 9: 337-41. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0629-y.
7. Jabin MSR, Schultz T, Mandel C, Bessen T, Hibbert P, Wiles L, et al. A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review of the Effectiveness and Experiences of Quality Improvement Interventions in Radiology. J Patient Saf. 2022; 18: e97-107. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000709.
8. Komp’yuternoe zrenie v luchevoj diagnostike: pervyj etap Moskovskogo eksperimenta: Monografiya. YU.A. Vasil’ev, A.V. Vladzimirskiy, editors. M.: Izdatel’skie resheniya, 2022. 388 р. (In Russ.)
9. Gusev AV, Vladzymyrskyy AV, Golubev NA, Zarubina TV. Informatization of healthcare in the Russian Federation: history and results of development. National Health Care (Russia). 2021; 2(3): 5-17. (In Russ.) doi: 10.47093/2713-069X.2021.2.3.5-17.
10. Kriegeskorte N, Golan T. Neural network models and deep learning. Current Biology 2019; 29: R231-6. doi: 0.1016/j.cub.2019.02.034.
11. Kelly BS, Judge C, Bollard SM, Clifford SM, Healy GM, Aziz A, et al. Radiology artificial intelligence: a systematic review and evaluation of methods (RAISE). Eur Radiol 2022;32:7998–8007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08784-6.
12. Lee CS, Neumann C, Jha P, Baumgarten DA, Chu L, Surovitsky M, et al. Current Status and Future Wish List of Peer Review: A National Questionnaire of U.S. Radiologists. American Journal of Roentgenology 2020;214:493–7. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.19.22194.
13. Platts-Mills TF, Hendey GW, Ferguson B. Teleradiology Interpretations of Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010; 38: 188-95. doi: 10.1016/ j.jemermed.2008.01.015.
14. Schmidt E, Lo HS, Saghir A. Peer learning in emergency radiology: effects on learning, error identification, and radiologist experience. Emerg Radiol. 2022; 29: 655-61. doi: 10.1007/s10140-022-02040-6.
15. Ludwig DR, Strnad BS, Bierhals AJ, Mellnick VM. Implementation of a peer-learning program in an academic abdominal radiology practice and comparison with a traditional peer-review system. Abdom Radiol. 2022; 47: 2509-19. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03523-3.
16. Moriarity AK, Hawkins CM, Geis JR, Dreyer KJ, Kamer AP, Khandheria P, et al. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2016; 13: 1519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.005.
17. Filice RW. Radiology-Pathology Correlation to Facilitate Peer Learning: An Overview Including Recent Artificial Intelligence Methods. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2019; 16: 1279-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.010.
18. Homayounieh F, Digumarthy S, Ebrahimian S, Rueckel J, Hoppe BF, Sabel BO, et al. An Artificial Intelligence–Based Chest X-ray Model on Human Nodule Detection Accuracy From a Multicenter Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4: e2141096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.41096.
19. Sheng K, Offersen CM, Middleton J, Carlsen JF, Truelsen TC, Pai A, et al. Automated Identification of Multiple Findings on Brain MRI for Improving Scan Acquisition and Interpretation Workflows: A Systematic Review. Diagnostics. 2022; 12: 1878. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081878.
20. Wu JT, Wong KCL, Gur Y, Ansari N, Karargyris A, Sharma A, et al. Comparison of Chest Radiograph Interpretations by Artificial Intelligence Algorithm vs Radiology Residents. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3: e2022779. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22779.
21. Vladzymyrskyy AV, Kudryavtsev ND, Kozhikhina DD, Shulkin IM, Morozov SP, Ledikhova NV, et al. Effectiveness of using artificial intelligence technologies for dual descriptions of the results of preventive lung examinations. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2022; 25(7): 7 15. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/profmed2022250717.
22. Morozov SP, Vladzymyrskyy AV, Shulkin IM, Ledikhova NV, Arzamasov KM, Andreychenko AE, et al. Feasibility of using artificial intelligence in radiation diagnostics. Medical doctor and information technology. 2022; 1: 12-29. (In Russ.)
23. Morozov SP, Gavrilov AV, Arkhipov IV, Dolotova DD, Lysenko MA, Tsarenko SV, et al. Effect of artificial intelligence technologies on the CT scan interpreting time in COVID-19 patients in inpatient setting. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2022; 25(1): 14 20. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/profmed20222501114.
24. Gusev AV, Vladzymyrskyy AV, Sharova DE, Arzamasov KM, Khramov AE. Evolution of research and development in the field of artificial intelligence technologies for healthcare in the Russian Federation: results of 2021. Digital Diagnostics. 2022; 3(3): 178-194. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/DD107367.
25. Chan SS, Francavilla ML, Iyer RS, Rigsby CK, Kurth D, Karmazyn BK. Clinical decision support: the role of ACR Appropriateness Criteria. Pediatr Radiol. 2019; 49(4): 479-485. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4298-2.
26. Martinez G, Katz JM, Pandya A, Wang JJ, Boltyenkov A, Malhotra A, Mushlin AI, Sanelli PC. Cost-Effectiveness Study of Initial Imaging Selection in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18(6): 820-833. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.013.
27. Subramaniam RM, Kurth DA, Waldrip CA, Rybicki FJ. American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria: Advancing Evidence-Based Imaging Practice. Semin Nucl Med. 2019; 49(2): 161-165.
doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2018.11.011.
28. Shulkin IM, Vladzymyrskyy AV. Data-based management in imaging: evaluation of the performance of a unified radiological information service model. MZ. 2022; 7: 68-80. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21045/1811-0185-2022-7-68-80.
29. Cooper K, Heilbrun ME, Gilyard S, Vey BL, Kadom N. Shared Decision Making: Radiology’s Role and Opportunities. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2020; 214: W62-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21590.
30. Woodhouse KD, Tremont K, Vachani A, Schapira MM, Vapiwala N, Simone CB, et al. A Review of Shared Decision-Making and Patient Decision Aids in Radiation Oncology. J Canc Educ. 2017; 32: 238-45.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1169-8.
31. Morozov SP, Vladzymyrskyy AV, Gombolevskiy VA, Kuz’mina ES, Ledikhova NV. Artificial intelligence: natural language processing for peer-review in radiology. Journal of radiology and nuclear medicine. 2018; 99(5): 253-258. (In Russ.) doi: 10.20862/0042-4676-2018-99-5-253-258.
32. Thomas SP, Fraum TJ, Ngo L, Harris R, Balesh E, Bashir MR, et al. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Peer Review: Missed Liver Lesions on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2022; 19: 1286-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.07.013.